Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)97

Execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights:
8 cases against Croatia

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

Having regard to the judgments listed below, transmitted by the Court to the Committee once they had become final;

Case name (App. No.)	Judgment of	Final on	Decision to close	
Gashi (32457/05)	09/10/2008	09/01/2009	1059 meeting
June 2009	
Kozlica (29182/03)	02/11/2006	02/02/2007	1007 meeting
October 2007	
Lesnina D.D. (18421/05)	25/10/2007	31/03/2008	1043 meeting
December 2008	
Mežnarić (71615/01)	15/07/2005	30/11/2005	992 meeting
April 2007	
Nikolac (17117/06)	10/07/2008	01/12/2008	1059 meeting
June 2009	
Nogolica (No. 3) (9204/04)	07/12/2006	07/03/2007	1028 meeting
June 2008	
Perić (34499/06)	27/03/2008	27/06/2008	1059 meeting
June 2009 	
Uljar and others (32668/02)	08/03/2007	08/06/2007	1013 meeting
December 2007	

Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded in the judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate, of individual measures to put an end to the violations and as far as possible to remedy their consequences for the applicant and general measures to prevent new, similar violations;

Having invited the authorities of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to execute each of the judgments listed in the table above;

Having, in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention, examined the information provided for each case provided by the authorities of the respondent state;

Having noted that the respondent state paid the applicant the just satisfaction, as provided in the judgments;

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and DECIDES to close the examination thereof.